How smart municipalities are creating safety networks where no single point of failure can cause tragedy.

In aviation, they call it “defense in depth”—the principle that critical safety functions should never rely on a single system or component. Commercial aircraft have multiple backup systems for navigation, multiple engines, multiple hydraulic systems, and multiple ways to control the aircraft. The reason is simple: when lives are at stake, redundancy is essential.

The same principle applies to municipal transportation safety, though many communities have been slow to recognize it. According to groundbreaking research from the National Cooperative Highway Research Program, successful Safe System approaches require that “redundancy is crucial” and that safety systems must be designed so that “if one part fails, the other parts still protect people.”

This isn’t just theoretical—it’s intensely practical. Every day, drivers in your community make mistakes. They’re distracted by their phones, fatigued from long work days, or simply overwhelmed by complex traffic situations. When these inevitable human errors occur, the question isn’t whether your safety systems will be tested, it’s whether they’ll perform when needed most.

Understanding Safe System redundancy

Traditional approaches to traffic safety often focused on single-point solutions. Install a stop sign to control an intersection. Add a traffic signal to manage complex movements. Paint lines to guide traffic flow. Each of these interventions addresses specific safety needs, but they operate in isolation, creating vulnerability when any single element fails.

The Safe System approach recognizes this limitation and demands a fundamentally different strategy. As the research explains, Safe System redundancy focuses on “designing robust backup systems” that provide “reliable protection for road users when other elements of the system fail.”

For municipal leaders, this means thinking about safety infrastructure not as individual components, but as integrated systems where multiple elements work together to prevent crashes. When one element degrades or fails, other elements compensate, maintaining overall safety performance.

Consider a typical intersection in your community. A Safe System approach to redundancy might include:

• Primary control: A stop sign provides the basic traffic control function.
• Visual reinforcement: Pavement markings and approach striping reinforce the stop requirement.
• Physical design: Intersection geometry that naturally encourages appropriate speeds.
• Visibility enhancement: Proper lighting and sight distance management.
• Backup systems: Reflective signage and markings that perform in all weather conditions.
• Behavioral cues: Consistent design standards that create predictable expectations.

In this layered approach, a driver who misses the stop sign might still respond to pavement markings, physical design cues, or other visual elements. No single failure point can compromise the entire safety system.

The signage layer in Safe System redundancy

Traffic signage represents one of the most critical layers in a redundant safety system. Signs provide essential information that drivers need to navigate safely: speed limits, warning messages, regulatory requirements, and wayfinding guidance. But signs don’t operate in isolation—they’re part of a complex communication system that includes pavement markings, traffic signals, roadway geometry, and environmental design.

The redundancy principle means that signage must reliably perform its function even when other system elements fail or when drivers are operating under less-than-optimal conditions. The research emphasizes that redundant systems must provide “reliable protection”—not just adequate performance under normal conditions, but dependable performance when stress-tested by real-world challenges.

For traffic signs, this reliability requirement has several dimensions:

• Temporal redundancy: Signs must perform consistently across all time periods – day and night, summer and winter, clear weather and storms.
• Environmental redundancy: Signs must remain effective across varying environmental conditions – different lighting situations, weather conditions, and seasonal variations.
• User redundancy: Signs must communicate effectively to different types of users – young and old drivers, visitors and residents, drivers of different vehicle types.
• Technological redundancy: As vehicle technologies evolve, signs must remain compatible with both older vehicles with basic lighting systems and newer vehicles with advanced headlight technologies.

This is where traditional approaches to sign management often fall short. Testing retroreflectivity during optimal daytime conditions using handheld devices provides only a limited assessment of actual redundancy performance. Real redundancy requires understanding how signs perform under all the conditions where they might be called upon to prevent crashes.

The innovation of comprehensive assessment

Waysights’ pioneering Retroreflectivity & Readability™ technology represents a fundamental advancement in assessing sign redundancy. By testing both the technical retroreflective performance and the practical readability of signs under real-world nighttime conditions, the technology provides the comprehensive assessment that true redundancy demands.

This dual assessment approach addresses a critical gap in traditional sign management. A sign might meet retroreflectivity standards but still fail to communicate effectively to drivers due to factors like:

• Competing light sources: Urban environments with multiple light sources can interfere with sign readability even when retroreflectivity is adequate
• Vehicle variability: Different headlight technologies, vehicle heights, and approach angles can affect how signs appear to drivers
• Environmental factors: Atmospheric conditions, seasonal variations, and local microclimates can impact sign performance
• Human factors: Driver age, vision capabilities, and attention levels affect how signs are perceived and processed

By assessing both retroreflectivity and readability, Waysights’ technology ensures that signs can fulfill their role in a redundant safety system—providing reliable communication even when drivers are stressed, distracted, or operating under challenging conditions.

Layers of transportation safety redundancy

To understand how signage fits into comprehensive safety redundancy, it’s helpful to examine the multiple layers that make up a truly safe transportation system:

Layer 1: Infrastructure design

• The physical design of roads and intersections provides the foundation for safety. Proper geometry, appropriate speeds, and logical traffic patterns create inherent safety benefits that don’t depend on driver behavior or decision-making.

Layer 2: Traffic control devices

• Signs, signals, and markings provide active communication to drivers about how to navigate safely. This layer includes not just the devices themselves, but their placement, visibility, and consistency across the network.

Layer 3: Vehicle safety systems

• Modern vehicles include increasingly sophisticated safety technologies—from anti-lock brakes to automatic emergency braking. These systems can compensate for driver errors or infrastructure limitations.

Layer 4: Driver education and enforcement

• Training, licensing, and enforcement systems work to ensure that drivers understand and follow traffic rules. These behavioral interventions complement physical infrastructure.

Layer 5: Emergency response

• When crashes do occur, rapid and effective emergency response can minimize consequences and prevent secondary incidents.

Layer 6: Data and feedback systems

• Continuous monitoring and analysis of safety performance enables ongoing improvement across all other layers.

The Safe System research emphasizes that effective redundancy requires coordination across all these layers. As the research notes, “all parts of the transportation safety system must be strengthened, so if one part fails, the other parts still protect people.”

The economics of redundant systems

Municipal leaders often worry that redundant safety systems will be prohibitively expensive. The reality is quite different— properly designed redundancy typically reduces total costs while improving safety outcomes.

• Reduced single-point-of-failure costs: When safety depends on individual elements functioning perfectly, the cost of failure is enormous. Redundant systems reduce the likelihood and consequences of such failures.
• Improved maintenance efficiency: Redundant systems can be maintained systematically without compromising safety during maintenance periods.
• Enhanced liability protection: Systematic redundancy demonstrates due diligence and provides strong protection against legal liability.
• Better resource allocation: Understanding how different safety elements work together enables more strategic investment decisions.

The research supports this economic perspective, noting that redundant approaches should focus on “whatever investment of resources and implementation of changes are required” to achieve safety objectives. This isn’t about spending more money—it’s about spending money more effectively.

Technology integration and smart redundancy

Modern technologies are enabling new forms of “smart redundancy” that weren’t possible with traditional approaches. Instead of simply adding more of the same type of safety infrastructure, municipalities can now implement complementary technologies that work together synergistically.

For example, Waysights’ automated assessment system creates smart redundancy by:

• Continuous monitoring: Unlike periodic manual inspections, automated systems provide ongoing assessment of sign performance, identifying degradation before it compromises safety.
• Comprehensive coverage: Automated systems can assess every sign in a municipality’s inventory, ensuring no critical elements are overlooked.
• Predictive analytics: Advanced analytics can predict when signs are likely to need attention, enabling proactive maintenance before failures occur.
• Integration capabilities: Modern systems can integrate with other municipal technologies, work order systems, budget planning tools, and performance dashboards – creating comprehensive redundancy across operational processes.

Building community resilience

Safe System redundancy isn’t just about individual crashes—it’s about building community resilience that can withstand various stresses and challenges. Climate change, demographic shifts, economic pressures, and technological evolution all create new challenges for transportation safety.

Redundant safety systems are inherently more resilient because they can adapt to changing conditions. When one element of the system faces new challenges, other elements can compensate. When environmental conditions change, multiple backup systems ensure continued safety performance.

The Safe System research emphasizes this resilience perspective, noting that safety systems must be able to “adapt road operations to changing environmental and social conditions”. Redundancy is what makes this adaptation possible without compromising safety.

The Vision Zero connection

Vision Zero, the goal of eliminating traffic fatalities and serious injuries, is fundamentally dependent on redundant safety systems. The Vision Zero philosophy recognizes that human errors are inevitable, so safety systems must be designed to prevent those errors from causing serious harm.

This directly aligns with the Safe System principle that “humans make mistakes” and that transportation systems “can be designed and operated to accommodate certain types and degrees of human mistakes”. Redundancy is the mechanism that makes this accommodation possible.

For municipal leaders pursuing Vision Zero goals, comprehensive signage management represents a critical component of overall system redundancy. Signs that perform reliably under all conditions provide essential backup protection when other system elements are stressed or compromised.

Implementation strategies for redundant safety

Building effective redundancy into municipal safety systems requires systematic planning and implementation. Based on Safe System principles and best practices from leading municipalities, effective redundancy implementation should include:

1. System mapping

• Asset inventory: Comprehensive documentation of all safety infrastructure elements.
• Relationship analysis: Understanding how different elements interact and support each other.
• Failure point identification: Identifying where single points of failure could compromise overall safety.
• Redundancy gaps: Recognizing where additional redundancy would provide the greatest safety benefits.

2. Performance standards

• Multi-condition testing: Assessing safety infrastructure performance under various conditions.
• Integrated performance metrics: Measuring how well different elements work together.
• Failure mode analysis: Understanding what happens when individual elements fail.
• Recovery capability assessment: Evaluating how quickly systems can recover from failures.

3. Technology integration

• Complementary technologies: Selecting technologies that work together synergistically.
• Data integration: Ensuring that different systems can share information effectively.
• Operational integration: Designing workflows that support redundant system management.
• Continuous improvement: Using data from multiple systems to refine overall performance.

4. Organizational alignment

• Cross-department coordination: Ensuring that different municipal departments work together to support redundancy
• Vendor coordination: Managing relationships with multiple vendors and contractors.
• Staff training: Developing capabilities needed to operate redundant systems effectively.
• Performance monitoring: Tracking the effectiveness of redundant approaches over time.

The future of smart redundancy

As technology continues to evolve, new opportunities for smart redundancy are emerging. Connected and autonomous vehicles will create new possibilities for dynamic safety systems that can adapt in real-time to changing conditions. Smart infrastructure will enable more sophisticated coordination between different safety elements.

However, these future capabilities will build upon the foundation of basic redundancy principles that municipalities must implement today. Communities that establish robust redundant safety systems now will be better positioned to take advantage of future technological advances.

The research emphasizes this evolutionary perspective, noting that Safe System implementation requires “iterating, learning, and innovating” in response to changing conditions and new opportunities.

Measuring redundancy effectiveness

Traditional safety metrics often focus on individual elements – how many signs were replaced, how many signals were upgraded, how many miles of striping were applied. Redundant systems require different metrics that assess overall system performance:

System-level metrics:

• Overall crash rates and severity across different conditions.
• Performance consistency during various stress conditions.
• Recovery time from system element failures.
• Cost-effectiveness of redundant vs. single-point approaches.

Resilience metrics:

• Performance during extreme weather events.
• Adaptation capability to changing traffic patterns.
• Maintenance efficiency across multiple system elements.
• User satisfaction with overall safety performance.

Integration metrics:

• Coordination effectiveness between different safety elements.
• Data sharing and communication between system components.
• Staff effectiveness in managing integrated systems.
• Technology integration success and reliability.

Conclusion: The imperative of redundancy

The days of relying on single-point safety solutions are ending. As communities pursue Vision Zero goals and implement Safe System approaches, redundancy isn’t optional—it’s essential. The question isn’t whether municipalities will implement redundant safety systems, but whether they’ll do so proactively or be forced to do so reactively after preventable tragedies occur.

The technology exists today to implement comprehensive redundancy across municipal safety systems. Solutions like Waysights’ Retroreflectivity & Readability™ system provide the kind of comprehensive, reliable assessment that redundant systems require. The organizational frameworks and implementation strategies are well-understood. The economic benefits are clear.

What’s required is leadership? The willingness to think systematically about safety, to invest in redundant approaches, and to build the kind of resilient community infrastructure that protects residents regardless of what challenges arise.

Every day, members of your community trust their safety to the systems you design, build, and maintain. That trust is earned through systematic redundancy, by ensuring that no single point of failure can cause tragedy, that multiple backup systems are always ready to protect, and that safety performance remains high even when individual elements are stressed or compromised.

The tools to build this redundancy are available today. The only question is: will your community lead this transition or be forced to follow?

_____________________________________________________________

1. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. A Guide to Applying the Safe System Approach to Transportation Planning, Design, and Operations. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.